#ETOM17 – Summer Retreat

centerlake.jpgSummer Retreat for the Educational Technology Organization begins at the Kettunen Center with just over 30 attendees from community colleges and universities across the state.

Tackling Wicked Problems Using Design Thinking
Dr. Leigh Graves Wolf, Michigan State University

The goals of the workshop are two-fold. First, participants will engage in an embodied experience using design thinking. This will give participants first-hand and participatory knowledge of design thinking techniques and processes. Second, participants will be using these design thinking methods to address a “wicked problem” identified by ETOM, which will produce solutions (and questions) for the ETOM retreat.

Our presenter is Dr. Leigh Graves Wolf. Leigh Graves Wolf is a teacher-scholar and her work centers around online education, emerging technologies and relationships mediated by and with technology. She has worked across the educational spectrum from K12 to Higher to further and lifelong. She has been a disc jockey, network administrator, teacher, instructional technologist and now professor. She believes passionately in collaboration and community and is currently the Assistant Director of the MSU Hub for Innovation in Learning & Technology, and academic specialist in the Dean’s office in the MSU College of Education, and a fixed-term Associate professor of Educational Technology at Michigan State University.

Notes:

  • Session Materials
  • How can we use Design Thinking to tackle this wicked problem: “Adequate Assessment of Online Classes”

Design Thinking is a mindset. Design Thinking is about having an intentional process in order to get new, relevant solutions that create positive impact. It’s human-centered. It’s collaborative. It’s optimistic. It’s experimental. – Eleanor Horowitz

Stanford dSchool

designthinking

British Design Council Double Diamond

The IBM Loop

Design Thinking for Libraries

Rules of Design Thinking

  1. The human rule – all design activity is ultimately social in nature
  2. The ambiguity rule – design thinkers must preserve ambiguity
  3. The re-design rule – all design is re-design
  4. The tangibility rule – making ideas tangible always facilitates communication

Keys

  • Diversity, Empathy, Ambiguity —> Possibilities then open up…

Wicked Problems

A wicked problem is a social or cultural problem that is difficult or impossible to solve for as many as four reasons: incomplete or contradictory knowledge, the number of people and opinions involved, the large economic burden, and the interconnected nature of these problems with other problems. (Kolko, 2012)

Group Work

  • Attendees split up to work in teams to attempt to address: “Adequate Assessment of Online Classes”

Michigan Colleges Online Update

  • Save the Date for the Fall Conference, October 27, located at Mid Michigan Community College.
  • Online Enrollments – CHLOE report, is Online Growth Rate Slowing Down? ITC enrollment report indicated a 1% increase from Fall 2015-16. Age of online students 53% are 18-25, 44% are 26+. MCO reports up 1-2% with a total of 66,115 enrollments.
  • What is the cause of flat enrollment growth rates? What are some strategies to move the needle with online enrollment?
  • SARA – 47 states CA, FL, and MA are not currently members. SARA members need to be posting a SARA Student Complaint Process.
  • MCO OER Repository Initiative
    • Goals: Improve student success and completion, lower costs for students, increasing inter-institutional faculty collaboration
    • Steering Committee: Faculty, IDs, DE Admins, Librarians
    • oercommons.org/hubs/mco (402 assets shared in last year, with 30 uniquely authored)
    • Faculty grants for adoption (4), adaption projects (5), and development projects (3)
    • MI OER Summit – September 22, 2017 hosted by Kellogg Community College. Call for proposals due June 23.
    • MR Technologist Program: Kellogg CC, GVSU, Lansing CC, GRCC, Mid-Michigan, Lake Michigan – program received JRCERT accreditation.
    • New certificate programs coming: Computed Tomography Tech, Electroencephalogram Tech
    • Help Desk Initiative – Kirtland, KVCC, LMC, NCMC, Mott, provides 24/7 model that augments your campus help desk. Provides for CRAC Guidelines and SARA.
    • Collaborative Purchases: NetTutor, TechSmith, ZOOM, ReadSpeaker

Table Talks

  • Focused sessions on student orientation, virtual reality, course quality, encouraging support for online learning across campus, etc.

#LCCOER – Creative Commons Licenses Workshop

Attendees will learn about the basics of open licenses (Creative Commons) including how to add open licenses to your work and best practices for attribution.

Notes:

  • Creative Commons FAQ
  • Consider your plans: Local (we can rely somewhat on fair use, library materials are paid for, we can make changes easily), Sharing (fair use is less applicable, because of distribution, subscription materials are not available everywhere), Grants (the founder may have restrictions, greater need for adaptation work, downstream users matter a lot).
  • Teach Act allows you to make copies for spontaneous use under Fair Use of copyrighted materials. However, reusing the same article is not covered under Fair Use. Using CC licenses is beneficial because they are openly licensed.
  • Elements of Licenses (Attribution, Share-Alike, Non-Derivative, Non-Commercial)
  • Currently the Creative Commons License is at 4.0.
  • Creative Commons Wiki
  • Creative Commons License Compatibility Chart

  • Goal is to maximize use and reuse.
  • TASL – Title, author, source, license.
  • CC Atribution 4.0 Creative Commons Marking – guidance of marking up work. E.g. “Chemistry” by OpenStax is licensed CC-BY 4.0.
  • Remixed work can only be shared if the licenses are compatible. 
  • For additional information about licenses see: Creative Commons FAQ 
  • Openly licensed content still has copyright.
  • Creating a CC license picker: https://creativecommons.org/choose/
  • Open Attribute is a browser plugin to capture CC license information.
  • Open Attribution Builder by Open Washington which provides assistance in creating a proper attribution.

#LCCOER – OER in K12 via #GoOpen Initiative


OER in the K-12 through Michigan’s Participation in the #GoOpen Initiative
Speakers:

  • Ann-Marie Mapes, Education Technology Consultant, Michigan Department of Education (MDE)
  • Teresa Fulk, Director of Instruction for Wayland Union Schools
  • Cheryl Wilson, Teacher Technology Consultant at Wayland Union Schools

Notes:

Why OER for K12? 

  1. Personalize learning
  2. Increase student engagement
  3. Customizable
  4. Flexible
  5. Free minimal costs
  6. Savings to be diverted to teaching and learning

“Textbook business in K12 is an $8 Billion (with a B) Business in the US”

MI Open Book Project

  • K-2 In Development
  • Michigan project by teachers for teachers
  • 3-8 Grade Series
  • High School US History
  • Economics

#GoOpen Campaign

  • Launched by US DOE
  • Encourage statewide OER statewide strategy and repository 
  • MI is one of 19 states to #GoOpen
  • Wayland and Marysville are #GoOpen Districts in the State

#GoOpen Community

  • Michigan #GoOpen Districts
  • MACUL
  • Lansing CC, GVSU, Open Michigan, Michigan Colleges Online, Library of Michigan

Systems of Support K12 Educators via Michigan #GoOpen Initiative

  • Awareness
  • OER Repository
  • Professional Learning (MACUL, REMC, MVU)
  • Access to Content
  • #GoOpen District Examplars

Wayland Union #GoOpen District 

  • 5th year in a 1:1 with 7-12 with an iPad
  • 2011-12 – staff received iPads in the spring, iTunesU K12 portal course management systems/blended learning
  • 2012-13 – grades 7-12 have iPads, math received MacBooks, increased blended learning, immediately our Math department began using OERS: ck-12, Engage NY
  • Building knowledge and skills as teachers become more comfortable with flipping instruction, using iPads, seeking free resources to take advantage of 1:1, desire for MacBooks for creation.
  • Grants and funding – MACUL provided MacBook for creation, WUEF provided MacBooks for textbook and Mac Mini for student created textbooks, TRIG – using resources for purchasing devices.

Current OER Use in Wayland

  • MAISA Units (K-8 ELA, 5-8 Social Studies)
  • Engage NY (Math)
  • Ck-12 (Math and Science)
  • Michigan Open Book Project (Social Studies)
  • Creative Commons
  • Continue to seek out others: OpenEd.com, OER Commons, and LearningRegistry.org

 Culture Shift for Teaching

  • Return to the art of teaching (not directed by the textbook)
  • Focus on student needs and standards as opposed to “getting through” the textbook
  • Personalized learning

Future of OER at Wayland

  • Continued implementation of MI Open Books Project
  • #GoOpen Commitment
  • Student created open resources
  • Continued professional development and suppport of OER

#GoOpen Future

  • Establish OER Repository 2017-18
  • Raise Awareness
  • Coordinate professional learning opportunities across organizations
  • #GoOpen districts as exemplars sharing their story
  • Move to “technology enabled transformative personalize learning”

eLearning2017 – Changing Institutional Culture with OER

Presenters:

  • Daniel Carchidi, Associate Director, Academic Technology, University of New Hampshire
  • Catherine Overson, Director, Teaching Learning and Research Services, CEITL
  • April Rau, Instructional Designer

Notes:

  • OER defined by Hewlett.org: “Open Educational Resources are teaching, learning, and research resources that reside in the public domain or have been released under an intellectual property license that permits their free use and repurposing by others. OER include full courses, course materials, modules, textbooks, streaming videos, tests, software, and any other tools, materials, or techniques used to support access to knowledge.”
  • OER Pilot 2015
    • Cable Green came to campus to kick off pilot.
    • Spent $30,500 for faculty stipends
    • About 1,000 students saved $150K.
    • Student outcomes were the same or better. Exam scores were either similar or exceeded exams of previous year.
    • Faculty indicate time and effort were worthwhile
    • Students favored perception of cost savings.
    • Faculty indicated they would continue using OER.
  • OER Support Team
    • Library – Finding and evaluating content, subject support, open licenses.
    • Academic Technology – Instructional design, course integration, technology support.
    • CEITL – Assessing student learning outcomes and faculty satisfaction.
  • Building on Pilot Success
    • Wrote successful $385,350 grant to USNH to support growth of OER at Granite State College, Keene State College, Plymouth State University, and UNH based on success of UNH pilot. Provide funding for ambassadors for each campus ($2K) of 15 faculty.
    • Target large enrollment courses to rapidly advance OER adoption and cost savings.
    • Build OER awareness and make OER adoption common.
  • Data Gathering and Awareness
    • Developing an institution wide survey based on Babson’s survey.
    • Faculty senate presentation for support.
    • Student leader support.
    • System level awareness and support.
  • Assessments
    • Textbook Savings
      • $131,000 students with 1,000 students savings.
    • Student Learning Outcomes
    • Student Perceptions and Ratings
      • 7 questions (rating scale):
        • easy to access
        • as high in quality as a textbook
        • broader perspective than textbook
        • Overwhelming number of materials
        • Choose OER for quality
        • Choose OER for cost savings
        • Resources helpful to learning
        • Open ended comments: cost savings, quality, technical issues, accessibility, clarity, usefulness, enjoyment
        • “No cost is a big plus”, “Would like all courses to use OER”, “OER same or better compared to textbook”, “Online textbook better aligns with the course”, “Online organization of material for online text can be confusing”, “Now all students have access to all materials”, “Easier to transport on phone or tablet compared to traditional textbooks” (always have their resource with them), “Helped in learning course content”, “Readings were interesting”, “Doing better in classes with OER materials”
        • Student learning outcomes were the same or better based on grades (within about 5 point difference).
    • Faculty Experience (ranking)
      • Technical support
      • Easy to find OERs for my course
      • Comprehensive Quality of OERs available
      • OERs used were up to date
      • Course updates were manageable
      • Student performance better
      • Student engagement better
      • Students’ exposure beyond the classroom
      • Course was enhanced
      • Consider textbook cost as a value to use OER
      • Will continue to use OERs
      • “Support and compensation helped defray cost”, “Students appreciated cost savings”, “Accessibility for DSR was built-in”, “Online textbook crashed before the exam”, “Energized teaching”, “More engagement with material”, “Cost savings”, “Lesson plans modified according to student feedback”, “Students enthusiastic”, “Next time, use a stepped modifications approach, rather than all at once”, “Create my own textbook”
      • OER opens the doors to examine and reshape course design.
      • Collaborating with Instructional Designers and Librarians is important.
      • Remember: Retain, Reuse, Revise, Remix, Redistribute by David Wiley
    • UNH Faculty Ambassadors – Highlight what UNH faculty are doing with OER.
    • UNH LibGuide
    • Capacity Building and Outreach
      • Instructional staff survey
      • Leadership retreat
      • Promo videos
      • Self-paced course development
      • Conference presentations
      • Campus Speakers (Cable Green)

 

#eLearning2017 – Having it All: How OER Give Faculty and Students what they Want

Presenter:

  • Sandra King, Professor, Communications, Anne Arundel Community College

Notes:

  • What students want
    • Reduced Cost: Maryland OER Day Keynote
    • Federal student loan debt is up to 1 Trillion, and college textbooks increased by 812% since 1978.
    • Access issues such as not purchasing the text, waiting to purchase a text, waiting for a text to arrive in the bookstore, purchasing the wrong text or edition, or misplacing/losing the text.
    • Engaging content, less text, more multimedia, graphics, interactive content to use and explore the content, animations, appropriate vocabulary (to include developmental students, ESL), and gaming elements < universal design
    • Example: $160 for communications textbook, OER costs $0.
    • Huge benefit is that students have access to the text the first day of class.
    • Articulate Storyline is used for interactive assessment.
    • Badges are awarded when 90% completed.
  • What faculty want
    • High quality courses: QM standards on measurable objectives, curriculum alignment (textbooks generally do not link to your course directly as far as curriculum), assessments
    • Accessibility: hard copies and eBooks, captioning,  self-described links, headers
    • Universal Design: graphics, audio, video
    • Currency: Up-to-date and relevant content
    • Liberation: publishers no longer dictate changes in terminology, or reorganization of content
    • Increased student satisfaction, engagement, and retention
  • Lessons learned
    • Give yourself extra time
    • What elements need to be implemented first and together
    • Gaming elements didn’t all work well
    • View implementing OERs as an ongoing project
    • Consider allowing students to participate
  • Resources for OERs

#eLearning2017 – Mobilizing Digital and Networked Media for the Longstanding Goals of Progressive Education

Mobilizing Digital and Networked Media for the Longstanding Goals of Progressive Education
Miduko “Mimi” Ito, MS, EdD, PhD @mizuko

fullsizerender-13With information and social connection so abundant it’s heartbreaking that not all learners have the same access to amazing educational opportunities that are relevant and key to their passionate interest.” Professor Ito says. The good news: “Through the smart deployment of new technology, we can begin to turn the tide.” As Chair of the MacArther Foundation-funded Connected Learning Research Network, Professor Ito explore the opportunities and risks of learning afforded by todays’ changing media ecology.

“People assume education has to take place in the classroom with a teacher,” she says. “Instead, we should be leveraging new media to enhance learning when they’re engaged in the things that inspire them.”

#eLearning2017

  • Q> What percentage of americans 16-29 read a book in 2012? A> 83%
  • Q> In 2015 how many hours per day did teens aged 13-18 spend with media? A> 8 HRS 56 MIN
    • watching tv
    • listening to music
    • video games
    • social media
    • reading
  • Q> How many teens 13-17 have made new friends online? (in 2015) A> 57% and 20% have met in real life. http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/04/09/teens-social-media-technology-2015/
  • What happens when these teens walk into our lecture halls?
  • RateMyProfessor, CheatHouse, We Take Your Class, etc. are around, but how can we take advantage of these technologies to maximize learning and to design learning with a purpose?
  • How can we use technology to engage students in new ways?
  • “45% of college students demonstrate very little learning in their first 2 years of college.” – Arum and Roska
  • We have the time at school and out of school. The world outside of the classroom has changed dramatically.
  • Enrichment expenditures on children 1972-2006 the wealthy families have tripled their investment over time to $9,000 and lower income $1,000. Athletics, arts, music, etc.
  • There has been a decline in school-based expenditures in extracurriculars.
  • How can technology help with this? Growth of MOOCs? The demographics of attenders of MOOCs indicate that many already have degrees and many of these help the privileged even more.
  • Connected learner = doing what they love, supported by others, tied to recognition
  • Interests <> Opportunities <> Peer Culture

connectedlearning.png

  • #learninghero – teachers are really important, family, mentors, administrators all help to connect and transform the enthusiasm of learning.
  • How can we engage students where they are…

Great Jobs Great Lives – “If graduates had a professor who cared about them as a person, made them excited about learning and encouraged them to pursue their dreams, their odds of being engaged at work more than doubled, as did their odds of thriving and their well-being.”

Learn more:

Keynote Video from the 21st Century Learning Conference

#EDU16 – Seeking Evidence of Impact: Methodologies in Teaching and Learning

img_1035Session Description: Benchmarking and collecting evidence of impact is important in any undertaking. In this respect, postsecondary teaching and learning presents a unique set of challenges and complexities, so the key is to identify those methods that will produce useful and actionable results. This session will consist of overviews of evaluation and research techniques and methods in three important domains in teaching and learning: online and blended learning, classrooms and learning spaces, and the LMS. We’ll conclude the session with a discussion with our domain experts about the relative strengths of the approaches they presented and considerations with respect to implementing them.
Outcomes: Learn about evaluation and research methods in key teaching and learning domains * Discover new methods that will help you conduct evaluations at your campus * Understand how these methods could be used at your institution

Speakers:

  • Tanya Joosten

    Director, Digital Learning R&D, DETA Center,University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
  • Adam Finkelstein

    Academic Associate,McGill University
  • Malcolm Brown

    Director, EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative,EDUCAUSE
  • Terence O’Heron

    Director of Operations, Teaching & Learning w/Technology,The Pennsylvania State University

Notes:

  • EDUCAUSE Assessment Resources
    • Learning Space Rating System
    • Information Security
    • Information Security Program Assessment Tool
    • IT Risk Register
  • EDUCAUSE Benchmarking Resources
    • Technology Research in the Academic Community
    • Core Data Service
    • Benchmarking Service

The big question… “Are these (active learning) rooms worth it?”

  • A Framework for Evaluation
  • Level of Impact (Kirkpatrick)
    • Reaction, Learning, Behavior, Results
      img_1030
  • Potential vs Actual – There is always potential but it may not be realized.
    img_1032
  • LSRS Sections – Institutional Readiness, and Features of Physical Spaces
    img_1031
  • Measuring Actual Use of Learning Spaces
    • Surveys
      img_1033
    • Observation forms were used to see how the classrooms were actually being used.
    • Heat Maps to track movement of instructor and students in the classroom.
  • Think about…
    • Providing the right people , the right information, at the right time
    • Focus on high quality faculty development in high quality spaces
    • Instructors are allowed to seek the potential and lead toward the actual
  • Online and Blended Learning
    • DETA – Toolkit Download is Available
    • The toolkit includes: access, learning effectiveness, satisfaction, instructional effectiveness
    • Research model:
      img_1036
    • Research questions include:
      img_1037
    • Framework of Inquiry:
      img_1038
  • Penn State LMS Research
    • Criterion
    • Assessment Strategy – Direct observations, focus groups (faculty and student), surveys (faculty and student), vendor review (support, training, and ID staff)
    • Business Requirements – Functional, technical, support, training, governance, partnership, exit strategy, cost

Faculty development is key across all implementation and research…